This page was launched on January 13, 2014. It is a work in progress.
________________________________________________________
Adhesion Contracts – the Louisiana Law Review (1974)
Articles of Incorporation – UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY (1925)
Bond vs. UNITED STATES by Judge Dale, retired
Case Monetization (CRIS Report) July 2003
Certificate of Incorporation Internal Revenue (1933)
Citizenship Repudiation – Melvin Stamper
Congressional Record (June 1932)
Congressional Record (June 1932 – copy of original)
Congressional Record (March 1933)
Congressional Record (June 1967)
Congressional Record (March 1993)
Continuation of the National Emergency (2012)
Continuation of the National Emergency (2013)
CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY OF AMERICA (1907 – amended 1930)
Declaration of Patient’s Rights
Independent Treasury Act – 1920
Louis McFadden – An Astounding Exposure (Congressional Record)
NASA – The Future of War (2001)
Presidential Executive Order 13132 – Federalism
Public Law 105-85: Experimentation on human subjects
Secret Maritime Jurisdiction Exposed
Senate Report 93-549 (excerpts page)
Senate Report 93-549 (1973 – original)
Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars – Air Force Technical Manual (1979)
Swiss Study: The Network of Global Corporate Control (2011)
The Legal Craft (The BAR Card)
UCC – Article 1 – General Provisions
War and Emergency Powers – Special Report by Eugene Shroder
AntiCorruption Society 
Pingback: They Have No Authority and You Can Demand That They RESIGN NOW!Impersonating a Commonwealth Official – Nelle's journey
Can you put up Judge Dale’s THE GREAT AMERICAN ADVENTURE Secrets in America
I want to get tbe Code of Canon Law that Frank uses. Can you refer me to where I would get that? Thanks
Dario
Can you tell me where the Clearfield Doctrine quote is in actual case law? I cant seem to find it… I have looked through the case briefs, and can’t find it… Is it quoted correctly? Or is it in error?
Thanks!
You might have to pay for a subscription to get the document: https://www.scribd.com/doc/96926258/The-Clearfield-Doctrine
Is it possible to remove, or edit the “Clearfield Doctrine” document PDF on this site, to reflect the correct information? Because the Clearfield Doctrine CASE actually says none of the information supposedly IN the case that the PDF document suggests is in there… It would be nice to get a rewrite of that, and get everything straightened out… I have been trying to share this information, and I can’t share it properly if the quotes are not in the case law that the PDF says to direct you to. (When you are actually shown the case law, and the quotes are not even there inside the case law to back up and support the point that you are trying to make, it can get embarrassing, and suggest that one doesnt know what they are talking about) 👈 Hence the need for accurate citing of proper case law all the way across the board.
Thanks!! 👍👏👏
Was this resolved?
Where is the entire study available? Was it omitted or never existed?
This was not resolved… I do not know anything about a study… But the Clearfield case itself mentions nothing at all about what the “Clearfield Doctrine PDF” that you can download on this site says that is in the case. So I am trying to find exactly where all of those quotes come from that is in that PDF:
(from memory)
“Governments descend to the level of private corporations when using commercial paper, governments lose their sovereignty when dealing in FRN’s, etc”
👆 Because ALL of these quotes are NOT in the Clearfield case, the record here needs to be corrected so as not to keep misleading people down a path that will not bear good fruit.
Does every single quote actually exist somewhere in case law? That would be AWESOME if they all did exist… Where are they? I dont know… I would seriously love to find them… But I do know that they are not a part of the Clearfield case… That much I do know.
Any help? Anyone? Thanks much!
Is there an admin that can help with this issue? Nobody seems to be able to resolve this. Or everyone is sleeping. There is inaccuracies in the Clearfield Doctrine pdf that I would like to get resolved. Thanks!
Our legal researchers have discovered multiple occasions where documents were altered or removed from law libraries, such as the original 13th Amendment. To their knowledge the quote first appeared in 1997 in The American Bulletin. We were able to locate a copy of that piece and have added its contents to our web site. If you click on the Clearfield Doctrine link, you can view it.
Pingback: Source Documents – Believe The Realization Of Ewe.
I’m looking for the final draft pdf handbook from Anna Von Reitz titled “From De Facto to De Jure”….can anyone direct me to this please…she said she was going to: “This invaluable handbook is available for free download from the Anti-Corruption Society website”
Thank you in advance for your valuable help…and for Anna for her exposing the corruption of this and past governments…
http://michiganassembly.info/index.php/
That’s not a pdf and she said it was a free pdf download from this website…
The authors of this plan – which did not include Anna – decided that this is the way they want it distributed.
@andri I found this…
Click to access fromdefactotodejure.pdf
Don’t rely on that copy, it was just a Draft. It is not the same as the final handbook.
Do you have any recommendations / litterature that would help applying this in Sweden? All the best! // Stella
My question that no one has been able to answer for me is how do you get free from the matrix(US CORP)? Everyone wants to charge to help someone I want to know has anyone filled UCC-1 and a trademark of the all caps name? And if so does it work in freeing you from the system? And if so what is the proper way to do this? Any help would be greatly appreciated thanks and God bless! You can email me here pherson.weathermon@gmail.com
Read Lawfully Yours
http://anticorruptionsociety.com/lawfully-yours/
Go to the United States of America 1781. Com
So here we are, wondering what to do about these people who want to control, manipulate, coerce, steal and generally raise Hell with the rest of us. These people have been around forever. What ever machinations they employ to leech from and control us they manage to snooker us into believing they are of some use until they go too far and we no longer buy the story. At that point chaos and destruction inevitably ensue. “It has ever been thus,” to quote some one smarter than me. I believe it was the first person to say it. Who ever that was. Where does that leave us, those of us who just want to be left alone? I’m not sure. Usually, but not always, it means bloodshed because these people are nothing if not tenacious.
The ebb and flow of history deposits some generations into valleys of relative peace and prosperity and others into seas of turmoil. This ain’t no valley. Can these people be run off without violent conflict? It certainly doesn’t look like it from where I sit. But who knows? But know this. Uncovering their methods-legalese, presumptions, assumptions, fraud, deceit- the usual dirty tricks -may be instructive but in the end we will have to make a decision. Do we allow them to enslave and control us or not? The Chinese sure know how to cast a curse. Hang on, it’s going to be a bumpy ride…..Oh yeah, don’t give up your guns.
I think Pat O Bannon outlines a good solution in his work “A grandfathers encouragement to our next generation”. Involves naming names and investigating their criminality. We the (oppressed) people need to take this on.
Do a great degree the information stated is now out dated so to speak. However, see if you can find 3 to 5 people to sit down and show the demolition of America. It is always good to know your enemy’s strategy because of how the human mind works.
If you think the information is out dated please be specific, as we don’t agree.
I believe what I referring to was that because the depth of information that continues to funnel into the categories of demise, takeover, enslave, etc….the overall game plan changes to fit the overall Goal of “Steal, Kill, and Destroy. The bottom line is it is just hard to capture all the information that goes into a category in these days we live in as it keeps building and changing. I am not necessarily disagreeing with the premise, just an observation. Thank you for allowing me to share. My specifics would be to much to type. It is just a general statement. This site is one of the best out there to educate, enlighten, etc..
When doing some research on my former county Sheriff i followed the UCC filings for him and came across several that were directly linked to him and would like to get other people’s take on their true meaning.
Bryan Keith: McElroy appears as a secured party and on one we find JACOB “JACK” LEW and MELBA ACOSTA FEBO named as debtors. Please Email me at Carl@YLN.tv so i can get these docs in your hand. Need some help trying to better understand their intent. I know they are important but just don’t know why.
Thank you,
carl -alfred: Swensson
What is your goal?
If only we were allowed to remain hunters and gathers back 10,000 years ago. That’s when the corruption really began and in the end that’s what the fight is all about. The Takers and the Leavers. Unfortunately, they won’t leave us alone. The essence of civilization is to enslave.
Others see it differently. Here is Vattel’s version:
Click to access vattel-the-law-of-nations-peace.pdf
It depends on what his definition of peace is. To imply there might never be conflict among humans is not realistic. It’s a nice piece though I will say. However, what humans have now is not conflict it is annihilation. To destroy completely. That’s what civilization has brought upon the world. It’s essence is to destroy and enslave. That’s a far cry from conflict. As far as total peace is concerned, that will never exist.
Civilization is not responsible, nor is humanity. There is a relatively small sect of Sabbatean bankers at the top who have created the nightmare we all face. They have been engaged in economic and weaponized warfare against Nations and natural law. Be sure to watch All Wars are Bankers Wars.
I agree. Only one culture is responsible. Totalitarian agriculturalists. Humanity and the earth was fine for the previous 3 million years.
No, that is not the problem. The problem is central banking. See All Wars are Bankers Wars.
I agree with you but they’re one and the same. The bankers didn’t just come out of nowhere. That’s like saying man was born a farmer. To understand the whole story it’s necessary to go back thousands of years. The whole story about who we really are has only just been told in the last 40-50 years. We all have to reevaluate the story of us. I believe it will take a while to apprehend the destructive path we are all on. Maybe centuries. That is, if we survive that long. I wish it were as simple as just blaming the bankers. Yes, they are a big part of the problem. A problem that has been going on for thousands of years.
Watch All Wars are Bankers Wars
Yeah, I watched it. It’s very good. It seems our cultural myth has come true. God created the world and man was created to conquer and rule it.
Have no idea what cultural myth you are referring to. But, surely you don’t think a small group of Sabbatean bankers (less than 1% of the population) represent 99% of the population? That is illogical.
God created the world and man was created to conquer and rule it. That isn’t our cultural myth? Then what is?
You are entitled to your own philosophical and/or religious point of view.
Has nothing to do with philosophy or religion. This message is being broadcast every day from the news desk, classroom, church, synagogue, mosque, billboards, boardrooms, science lab, etc., etc. Thousands if not millions of times per day. And it’s been preached for centuries. If you don’t agree I want to know the story that has been told all this time?
No, I do not agree. It is just a philosophy that is not shared by everyone.
Vattel is dead and gone and his imaginary abstract ideas are irrelevant to what happens in the courts…its all a big contract and “they” presume and assume things and if you do not correct their assumptions and presumptions and create a new contract/standing right then and there….then they assume you are incompetent and administer the account and assign your flesh as surety…its just that simple. Negotiate the contract!
Read LAWFULLY YOURS available from the tab at the top of the home page.
I notice in your website the words Common Law. I suggest you go careful with this term. Look at Frank O’Collins’s work: How to Win in Court. He shows that historically Common Law dates back to henry V111. The word Common indirectly relates to Slavery. If one uses the words: House of Commons, in UK. This translates into House of (Lawful) Slaves. Yes! Unlawful Slavery has been outlawed, BUT NOT Lawful slavery. Frank goes into the historical roots and shows that history has been manipulated.
Where do I refer to “Common Law”?
Frank has done some really good research. We’ve used his “Twelve Presumptions of the Court” in our LAWFULLY YOURS Guide.
common-law is an illusion to further enslave you…i think you are all confusing common-law with positive law. I am a member of One Heaven and I am very versed and learned in what franks philosophies are and where he came to those conclusions…I can tell you this…what you believe is common-law was based on the ratification of the Magna Charta which was an illusion as it was signed under duress which makes it an invalid contract and you can research this and see how many statutes “they” issued right after the supposed adoption of the Magna Charta…they issued statutes that essentially nullified everything on paper…one must remember that back then most people were illiterate…
true ‘common-law’ would be the commandments Jesus pointed out….which all stem from the one true law…”do unto others as you would have them do unto you”
I think many people confuse the terms common-law with natural-law.
do unto others as you would have them do unto you” Except when it comes to psychopaths. They might expect to be harmed if given the chance.
Frank O’Collins has done some excellent research. We have included his 12 presumptions of the court in our LAWFULLY YOURS guide.
This is urban legend and has nothing to do with the district of criminals.
Articles of Incorporation – UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY (1925) This is a company that does corporate filings that is still in existence today. Please look up the names, gunter, howard and britton
https://books.google.com/books?id=a9U9AQAAIAAJ&pg=PP2&dq=gunter,+howard+and+britton+corporation,+history+of+us+corporation+co&hl=en&sa=X&ei=cYCYVefhJsfnsAWgmLOQCg&ved=0CD8Q6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=gunter%2C%20howard%20and%20britton%20corporation%2C%20history%20of%20us%20corporation%20co&f=false
Sorry, but you are wrong. The link you provided is to a book that was written by BAR attorneys dated 1921. The book describes the “business corporation laws”. The Articles of Incorporation of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY were filed in Florida in 1925. Please view this reading and assessment of those articles: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VFyQb2kqO0
In 1933 the UNITED STATES was bankrupted by the scheming international banksters who owned the FEDERAL RESERVE. Rep Louis McFadden entered the whole scam into the Congressional Record. It was then reorganized under the bankruptcy and the banksters were made the “trustees”. Please read The Bankrupcty of America: http://anticorruptionsociety.com/the-bankruptcy-of-america-1933/
See also: Who is Running America – link posted on our home page.
Can you please point me in the direction of the Bond vs. United States that you are talking about because everything that I can find about it using the citation provided talks about Border Patrol Agent feeling bags of luggage. I can’t find anything about it upholding Sovereignty. Before I try to use any of this stuff I want to see the decision for myself. Thank you.
Judge Dale explains what happened to the Bond V UNITED STATES decision in this article: http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2015/01/07/the-missing-13th-amendment/
Judge Dale explains what happened to the Bond V UNITED STATES decision in this article: http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2015/01/07/the-missing-13th-amendment/
However, there are strategies for dealing with many situations in the LAWFULLY YOURS guide. http://anticorruptionsociety.com/lawfully-yours/
A letter to my friend Steven Pattison –
Steven,
Having known you now for approx. 5 years you know that I am cautious in many ways and not so much in others.
After gaining and then losing about 130 lbs. four times in my life, I believe the message finally sunk in. Leave the excess baggage behind. Carrying that extra weight didn’t have to but I allowed it to affect my thinking on matters outside of personal concerns.
It took a conscious effort to do what you’ve always suggested, divorce myself from the Straw man, and now that I have a new perspective has emerged, along with the disappearance of the extra weight. One that has me thinking more in terms of what can be done to improve the lot of my fellow man. The answer came easily but mainly because of the influence of people like you, who give their time and knowledge, freely and without hesitation, to those who are hungry for the truth. In this regard I must now take your que and begin to return what I can to those who travel the parallel path.
We each have a purpose for being here. My mother used to tell me this all the time. She also said that everyone I meet along the way will have something important to share and it will be up to me to figure out what that something is. It was that and the constant reminder that I must learn patience that she instilled in me.
The patience part took the longest to learn and whether or not it fully sunk in I’ll leave for her to tell me when next we meet. As for the part about everybody having something important to share, she couldn’t have been more correct but it remains an elusive goal for most because without the patience you’ll never truly get the message.
Things like regional differences in dialect, tonal inflections and sometimes even body language become signals to try harder or pay a bit more attention, while at the same time signaling the desire to leave that situation as expeditiously as possible.
All of this comes into play when interacting with what I consider the friends I now have. Many share one commonality which is the desire to affect change for the betterment of mankind. The only separation is in the methods used to get there.
So, after all that bloviating, let me get to the point. My research into the criminal cabal we call government has led to revelations and wonderment. Most you’re already aware of but here’s one thing you’re not.
In going through the exercise of having my public servants provide their Oaths and Bonds I ran across something that you need to be aware of. Risk management companies. Why they are now important is because of what they’ve turned into. Where once the term conjured up images of consulting firms now they’re being pawned off as insurance brokers. Specifically for governments of every kind from FED to local. Problem is, they’re not registered as such. It now appears that the move to privatize public agencies has spawned yet another growing cottage industry tailored for the slightly more astute government criminal.
With checks being drafted, each year, for rather large sums designed to secure liability coverage for certain elected and appointed individuals a whole host of former government employees have peeled off and formed these risk management companies. With previously established relationships in government, they have a leg up on competition to secure bonding money dollars and from what I can now reveal, most every State now uses these entities. Seems they’ve had this little niche market for at least as long as private jails have been around but how they operate is what’s real interesting.
From what I’ve been able to uncover, it works like this… Here in Georgia it’s really two companies. One, the parent, is locked into David Rockefeller’s America 2050/U. N. Agenda 21/I.C.L.E.I., siphoning off tax dollars I’ve yet to identify. The sub or sister company deals mostly in taking in Bonding money. The Association County Commissioners of Georgia was established in 1914 and has patiently worked its way into every aspect of Government/business. The number of private sector jobs they’ve displaced can only be guessed at but their assumptive role as insurance for the State, self insurance that is, has lent itself to offshore funneling (in the case of Colorado) of huge chunks of this recurring revenue for reasons one can only guess at. That and how liability cases concerning State and local governments are now handled is quite alarming. We hear of very few government liability cases these days because the circle of those providing and those needing this coverage comes complete with an Army of Attorneys and Law enforcement personnel that are being used to terrorize those who would dare file such suits ( have witnessed a local experience with this M.O.).
From what I can now report, using Presidential Executive order 13132 nobly titled Federalism, Agencies are either born or spun off using seed money provided by unreported assets realized every year through the use of double entry bookkeeping proudly on display in every CAFR I’ve seen regardless of the organization. The very first and telling discrepancy will be found in the declared net worth statement of each year. Taking long term bond obligations in total and writing them off in the liabilities section to substantially offset assets is but one of many clever little tricks they use. They may even go as far as to re-sign, the way we would commercial paper balloons every three years so they could more easily explain this anomaly. Then use those funds for any off books capers that get conjured up. Seed money to start such a venture would have necessarily been high. Higher than the meager savings of some former County/State employees. Now, these funds are beginning to get so fat that they may be getting ready to burst at the seams. Or should I say disburse. But I digress,
The subsidiary called Interlocal Risk Management Agency:
From their web site –
ACCG – IRMA is also a self-insured pool that members join to provide insurance coverage for property, automobile, general liability, law enforcement liability, public official’s liability, crime and boiler and machinery exposures. It too is owned by its members and managed by a Board of Trustees whose members are from participating counties. The fund began in 1987 with 14 members and today has 157 members with assets of approximately $102 million. ACCG – IRMA has returned over $17.6 million in dividends to its members. Because county governments operate different types of agencies from the private section – such as law enforcement, jails, and roads – their exposures are unique and require specialized coverage. View the ACCG-IRMA Board Members – See more at: http://www.accg.org/content.asp?CatId=246&ContentType=Service_Content#sthash.tbS99T8l.dpuf –
Is the one that has my attention because it provides the bonding for Sheriff’s and the like. Problem is, when you ask for them to produce their bonds, they cannot. All they can do is show you who they wrote the check to. I’ve been working with a couple of guys in Colorado, Jim Porter and Steve Curry who have the same setup and that group is about to get to know what a hammer to the head feels like when this busts wide open. That or Jim will again have a shot taken at him by an as yet to be indicted shooter known to the Montrose County Sheriff.
A few calls on Monday will provide me the final pieces needed to go back to my Sheriff and request him to either bond up right then or I talk to every Deputy I can find until one of them shows and interest in immediately becoming the interim Sheriff by securing his personal bond. At that point I’ll carry my happy butt down to a few of the bigger banks and put on deposit my Bill of Exchange, along with my sworn affidavit letting them begin the process of collecting on the already made out one for the max of the liability coverage required by law and as soon as one of them agrees to my 50/50 split it will be Katey bar the doors. Granted, that part has a large part of wishful thinking involved but it won’t take many such BOE’s being filed before the stuff really begins to hit the fan. Having already filed an un-rebutted affidavit of truth in regards to the state of treason and sedition on the part of my County Commission Chairman (yes, more than one signed on to it) that accompanied my official charges submitted on the 20th of Jan.
So just think about it Steven, even though this is something you haven’t talked about, at least to my knowledge, you had a hand in playing simply because of your unending dedication to the pursuit of truth. For that, I salute you and as I look towards the heavens, will now ask, is there more I need to learn from this man?
Your friend in the pursuit,
carl alfred: The house of Swensson
wow someone is very lonely….nice book of gibberish you created here. This is a blog post commentary…not a place to write your novel bub. What you speak of is IMAGINARY abstract ideas and its ALL FICTION OF LAW…it does not exist…PERIOD. So get your head out of their fiction, stop worrying about their bullshit and create something new. You are feeding their system by giving it your attention and belief. We can beet these fools by ignoring them out of existence! You people are hung up on getting and extracting revenge…and you are not seeing the big picture. Everything is a contract that is made in the NOW…all this non-sense about when the bankruptcy happened and why is IRRELEVANT…also their fictional INTERNAL corporate policies have nothing to do with you unless they convince you it somehow applies to you…and we all know when it comes right down to it there is no way they can prove that unless you were totally informed and agreed willingly to participate in their fraud..stop wasting your time learning their fictional bullshit. Every interaction is a contract/agreement happening in the NOW. Not based on fictional bullshit that was written down on some piece of paper by a bunch of guys that are long dead and gone!
You comments verify that you have not read our LAWFULLY YOURS guide. We are well aware that it is all about contracts.
I have a question about my signature – today I was requested to sign my
“name” (as it appears on my birth certificate) to obtain my state DMV license so I signed my name with “all rights reserved, U.C.C. 1-308” and I was denied adding this as my legal signature – in which I gave my non-consent. I was told either I sign my name only (without the all rights reserved, U.C.C. 1-308) or I wouldn’t be able to get my license. I was told that I could go to a State office to apply for DMV (and they may not allow me to sign my name this way) I told them this is my signature.
I was intimidated by the County Clerk personnel to follow protocol or go without a driver license (this for that tactic) Question: How do I prove this is how I sign my name? Or how do I convey my legal signature must contain the “all rights reserved U.C.C. 1-308”?
It is very important to me that I convey “all rights reserved” anytime I sign my signature. I went back to read Judge Dale’s .pdf but it doesn’t have anything related to “signature”.
Does anyone have any information that would help with this question?
And is there any recourse that I may take (after the fact)?
Thank you,
Sincerely
Signed: “name withheld”, until I determine my legal signature with all my reserved rights.
Some people use the ellipsis to overcome this problem. When you precede your signature with an ellipsis (three dots like: . . . ) it means that something else is included but not expressed.
This is what I don’t like about licensing under the state, city, or county. They want to play under the UCC rules but don’t like it when it’s used against them. I suppose you’d be able to hold them accountable in some way but they know there aren’t many people with the resources that can so they just buck the rules of the game. Meanwhile, how are you suppose to drive to work or the grocery store etc.? This is how they control everyone. They get you at the DMV and with the IRS paperwork employers present you with when starting a job. I’ve seriously considered getting rid of my car and going homeless to avoid contracting with them.
maybe let them know that it says not to use the birth certificate as identification…so asking you to sign the name as it appears on the BC is fraud…as you are only an accommodating party…tell them to give you an affidavit stating why they would not issue you the license…specifically to write that it was because you wanted to use UCC 1-308. I bet that changes their mind…if they refuse call their bos and tell them U need something to show the police when you get pulled over and the court when you go address any violation…why you were refused…BINGO-BANGO you now have lawful excuse, as they cannot force you to sign your signature a certain way…
Response from top level supervisor at DMV to “U need something to show the police when you get pulled over and the court when you go address any violation…why you were refused…” is “Sorry, I can’t give you anything in writing.” Now what?
Since the inception of the FBI’s training program at the FBI Academy in Quantico, Virginia in 1935, and in each field office, Bureau agents have lectured law enforcement officers from every state in the union and many foreign countries that, when performing their duties as law enforcement officers (under color of law), all persons have certain civil rights under existing federal statutes and court decisions which must be considered.
To deprive persons of these rights subjects the law enforcement officer (sheriff, highway patrolman, policeman) to investigation by the FBI. Legal action, both civil and criminal, may result from these deprivations.
For over 60 years, the FBI has conducted civil rights investigations and submitted investigative reports to the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. These investigative reports, submitted without recommendation, are reviewed by Justice Department attorneys who determine what, if any, subsequent investigation should be conducted and whether or not the U.S. Attorney in whose jurisdiction the alleged violation occurred should present the case to a Federal Grand Jury for indictment consideration.
http://www.lectlaw.com/filesh/tabcvrt.htm
EXTORTION UNDER COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT
The wrongful taking by a public officer of money or property not due to him or his office, whether or not the taking was accomplished by force, threats, or use of fear. In other words, the wrongful use of otherwise valid official power may convert lawful action into unlawful extortion. So, if a public official misuses his office by threatening to take or withhold official action for the wrongful purpose of inducing a victim to part with property, such a threat would constitute extortion even though the official was already duty bound to take or withhold the action in question.
http://www.lectlaw.com/def/e072.htm
FICTION OF LAW
The assumption that a certain thing is true, and which gives to a person or thing a quality which is not natural to it, and consequently establishes, a certain disposition, which, without the fiction, would be repugnant to reason and to truth. It is an order of things which does not exist, but which the law prescribes or authorizes. It differs from presumption because it establishes as true, something which is false; whereas presumption supplies the proof of something true.
The law never feigns what is impossible. Fiction is like art; it imitates nature, but never disfigures it. It aids truth, but it ought never to destroy it. It may well suppose that what was possible, but which does not exist; but it will never feign that what was impossible actually is.
Fictions were invented by the Roman praetors who, not possessing the power to abrogate the law, were nevertheless willing to derogate from it under the pretence of doing equity. Fiction is the resource of weakness which, in order to obtain its object, assumes as a fact what is known to be contrary to truth: when the legislator desires to accomplish his object, he need not feign, he commands. Fictions of law owe their origin to the legislative usurpations of the bench.
It is said that every fiction must be framed according to the rules of law, and that every legal fiction must have equity for its object. To prevent their evil effects, they are not allowed to be carried further than the reasons which introduced them necessarily require.
The law abounds in fictions. That an estate is in abeyance; the doctrine of remitter, by which a party who has been disseised of his freehold and afterwards acquires a defective title, is remitted to his former good title; that one thing done today, is considered as done at a preceding time by the doctrine of relation; that because one thing is proved, another shall be presumed to be true, which is the case in all presumptions; that the heir, executor, and administrator stand by representation in the place of the deceased are all fictions of law. “Our various introduction of John Doe and Richard Roe; our solemn process upon disseisin by Hugh Hunt; our casually losing and finding a ship (which never was in Europe) in the parish of St. Mary Le Bow, in the ward of Cheap; our trying the validity of a will by an imaginary wager of five pounds; our imagining and compassing the king’s death, by giving information which may defeat an attack upon an enemy’s settlement in the antipodes; our charge of picking a pocket or forging a bill with force and arms; of neglecting to repair a bridge, against the peace of the king, his crown and dignity are circumstances, which, looked at by themselves, would convey an impression of no very favorable nature, with respect to the wisdom of our jurisprudence.”
http://www.lectlaw.com/def/f111.htm
Yes the courts are corrupted…i have broken it down like this. 1 question can beat ANY court proceeding: “Does this court exist by FICTION OF LAW and are you compelling me to believe it and partake in your fraud?”
I have tried some of these techniques ,the courts ignore the action and threaten criminal charges and arrest . now i have gotten court documents , traffic tickets, written to the capitol first letters , and lower case the rest of them. The fact is if you sign for the strawman you are responsible for the action, you can take the “right to travel ” stance but expect to be hassled and challenged often by the weapon toting corporate enforcers .
not if you do it correctly and give due notice…one must stick to their beliefs, if you falter and do not have conviction in your stance then they take advantage of that…be a boss not a employee!
I am certain that the Act of 1871 was abolished in 1874. That being said, you should find in a case Respublica vs Sweers ( 1794 ) that the US is a corporation. In Bouvier’s Law Dictionary ( 1857 ) , United States of America ( entry 5, page 613, it says the US of A is a corporation flat out.
http://books.google.com/books?id=JNuHAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA3797&lpg=PA3797&dq=charters+and+constitutions+of+the+united+states+poole&source=bl&ots=Os0qtge6Ah&sig=ifPJR-zUkJ3Fy7gVevvDPqW6_LI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=aUUMVKbUA6bbsAS264GYDA&ved=0CEYQ6AEwBDgK#v=onepage&q=charters%20and%20constitutions%20of%20the%20united%20states%20poole&f=false Here you will find in the original charters, the term corporation is used frequently. The original corporate colonies simply became corporate states. Notice also, how the articles of incorporation you’re citing above resemble the US Constitution.
I have seen no evidence that the Act of 1871 was abolished in 1874. However, after the bankruptcy of 1933 the corporation was restructured to include the Public Trust (cestui que vie) that is still in effect. Please read Judge Dale’s The Great American Adventure, which can be located on our home page.
http://ep.yimg.com/ty/cdn/realityzone/UFNsnakeoil.html
June 1, 1871: The elected mayor and council of Washington City and Georgetown, and the County Levy Court are abolished by Congress and replaced by a governor and council appointed by the president. An elected House of Delegates and a non-voting delegate to Congress are created. In this act, the jurisdiction and territorial government came to be called the District of Columbia, thus combining the governments of Georgetown, the City of Washington and the County of Washington. A seal and motto, “Justitia Omnibus” (Justice for All), are adopted for the District of Columbia.
June 20, 1874: The territorial government of the District of Columbia, including the non-voting delegate to Congress, is abolished. Three temporary commissioners and a subordinate military engineer are appointed by the president.
June 11, 1878: In The Organic Act of 1878, Congress approves the establishment of the District of Columbia government as a municipal corporation governed by three presidentially appointed commissioners: two civilian commissioners and a commissioner from the military corps of engineers. This form of government lasted until August 1967.
December 24, 1973: Congress approves the District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act, P.L. 93-198, which establishes an elected mayor and a 13-member council.
http://www.narpac.org/ITXICE.HTM
http://books.google.com/books?id=_29DAAAAIAAJ
http://books.google.com/books/download/Origin_and_government_of_the_District_of.pdf?id=iAPvyfPGmFsC&hl=en&capid=AFLRE71oFqvctaczimYcz3srZ21i2G8QnXH8Y8rLUXn9T093s1tCXa1TbN_p0zaLqIoo0P_YuWXbjFR36kOeHh-_ixxEjXB0Xw&continue=http://books.google.com/books/download/Origin_and_government_of_the_District_of.pdf%3Fid%3DiAPvyfPGmFsC%26output%3Dpdf%26hl%3Den
There’s where you can read about the abolishment of The Act of 1871. My point is , it’s always been corporations. From the original charters to the Constitution, it was said that adopting the constitution , by many anti-federalists, that the states would be reduced to mere corporations of the National Government, the parent corporation.
You guys are right on a lot of points, but off on some in my opinion. And those off points will get you in trouble.
For instance. That document on the incorporation of the United States is clearly not for the government of the United States. I am more inclined to believe the search results from the Delaware Secretary of State’s web site for the United States than your pdf file. https://delecorp.delaware.gov/tin/GINameSearch.jsp
And who knows who “Judge Dale” is. He could be me as far as you know. He makes since in some ways, but not in others. I have tried some of the things he says before even reading his info, and it doesn’t work. A friend of mine lost his driver’s license doing those things and has been fighting for at least the last year now.
Rod Class has the history of the corruption pretty well nailed down now, but is leaning too far into the “sovereign” stuff now.
I give you guys an A for trying though! Keep exposing the crooks even if everything you say is not true. The goal is to wake up as many as possible and make them as “mad as hell”, and get rid of the crooks in DC and restore the Republic.
Take Care!
Actually, I know who Judge Dale is.
Former attorney for the World Bank validated both Judge Dale’s and Rod Class’s information.
It is difficult to say what will work in our courts as they are all incredibly corrupt. Once you examine their connection to the Federal Reserve and the fact that the Judge gets a pay off for a conviction, the ‘rules’ become rather dim. Judge Dale’s advice in his section on Legal Processes is to stay out of their courts.
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
Emerges as the Law of the Land
http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/overview.html
By 1938 the corporate Federal Government had the true bankruptcy case they had been looking for. Now, the bankruptcy that had been declared back in 1930 could be up-held and administered. That’s why the Supreme Court had to be stacked and made corrupt from within. The new players on the Supreme Court fully understood that they had to destroy all other case law that had been established prior to 1938. The Federal Government had to have a case to destroy all precedence, all appearance, and even the statute of law itself. That is, the Statutes at Large had to be perverted. They finally got their case in Erie R.R. v. Thompkins. It was right after that case that the American Law Institute and the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws listed right in the front of the Uniform Commercial Code, began creating the Uniform Commercial Code that is on our backs today. Let us quote directly from the preface of the 1990 Official Text of the Uniform Commercial Code 12th edition.
Now knowing that our country has been under attack since it’s inception, and before, to not allow freedom to reign, do you feel that since 1860 was also part of our downfall? Such as the reconstruction acts of 1868 and the overthrow of many southern states to comply with “The Plan” or else?
Absolutely.
However, after 1871 when the United States Corporation took over Washington, DC, the Constitution was slowly replaced by the Uniform Commercial Code. https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/who-is-running-america-booklet.pdf