Tag Archives: police state

Guatamala, Terrorism and US

The similarities between what happened in Guatemala in 1954 and what is happening in America are stark to say the least. The Global Elite Scum of the Earth have had a lot of experience with the divide and conquer strategy.

To really understand what has been going on for years, and what has been done “in our name”, please take time to watch Scott Noble’s documentary series: The Power Principle.

They can’t have a “police state” with an armed population!

FORMER SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS, RAISES IMPORTANT QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SANDY HOOK SHOOTINGS!

Mr Roberts is extremely knowledgeable about the financial (and media) ‘coup’ that has taken place in America. He is also one of the few economists that has no loyalty to any political party. He is an independent and his loyalty is to the American people. In this interview, Mr Roberts explains how making alcohol and drugs illegal only served to give birth to criminal enterprises that have thrived for decades. There is no reason to believe that a ban on guns will be any different.

Historically gun bans have only benefited tyrannical governments and criminals.

Life in Occupied Chicago

Stephen Lendman, Contributor, Activist Post
Sunday May 20, 2012

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book is titled How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War

Through Monday, downtown residents live in occupied Chicago.

Secret Service agents, NORTHCOM and National Guard forces, as well as thousands of state and local police seem everywhere.

Getting around feels hazardous. Anyone may be stopped, searched,  interrogated, even arrested.

Residents were advised to hunker down and stay out of harm’s way as best as possible. For many, it’s not easy. More on a city under siege below.

NATO is the world’s first global war-making alliance. Largely a US imperial tool, it’s a killing machine. Its 28 members and dozens of partner states comprise about one-third of the world’s nations.

Article 4 of its charter calls for members to “consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territorial integrity, political independence, or security of any” is threatened.

Article 5 considers an armed attack (real or otherwise) against one or more members, an attack against all, and calls for collective self-defense.

Imperial conquests are planned. Wars are launched. Fundamental laws are violated. Nonbelligerent states are targeted. Vast destruction follows. Millions die. Human misery is incalculable. One conflict follows another in an endless cycle of worldwide collective punishment.

NATO’s a global menace, a killing machine, a weapon of mass destruction threatening humanity, an alliance for war, conquest and dominance, not peace.

Enemies don’t exist so they’re invented. Wealth and power interests alone benefit. Humanitarian intervention is code language for aggressive wars. Pretexts are contrived to wage them.

NATO plans global dominance. China’s being encircled. Encroachment approaches Russia’s borders. It’s targeted by strategic missiles for offense, not defense. At the 2010 Munich Conference, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said:

After the Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact dissolved, ‘a real opportunity emerged to make the OSCE (Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe) a full-fledged organization providing equal security for all states of the Euro-Atlantic area.’

However, the opportunity was missed, because the choice was made in favor’ of expanding NATO eastward to Russia’s borders.

Russian President Vladimir Putin sent a message. He cancelled plans to attend the May 18 and 19 G8 summit. He won’t be with NATO states in Chicago.

Prime Minister Dmitri Medvedev represents him. Both leaders are justifiably concerned.

Putin participated in the Moscow Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) summit with most former Soviet Republics.

On May 3 and 4, 50 nations attended the Moscow missile defense conference.  Representatives from NATO’s 28 states came. So did China, Japan, and South Korea.

At issue was America’s so-called missile shield. It represents major friction between Moscow and Washington. So is concern about war on Syria and Iran, as well as Obama administration officials fomenting and backing anti-government protests in Russia.

Full story