As a result of the manipulated Bankruptcy of the United States in ’33 – exposed by Rep Lewis McFadden and others in the Congressional Record – that precipitated President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s confiscation of the people’s gold and implementation of The New Deal – the following change in the “Law of the Land” occurred.
Excerpts from attorney Melvin Stamper’s book, Fruit from a Poisonous Tree. Comments by AntCorruptionSociety are in brackets.
[REGISTRATION]
Page 59
Massive registration of property through United States agencies, including the States of the Union as instrumentalities of the federal government in bankruptcy, assured the United States and its officers and instrumentalities (the states) that they would become wealthy beyond their wildest expectations, as predicted by Colonel House. Edward Mandell House had this to say in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson (President, 1913-1921). From the private papers of Woodrow Wilson:
“Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging.
[This is done when mothers fill out and submit a “Certificate of Live Birth”.]
By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living.
[This is why we “register” for a Social Security Number.]
They will be our Chattel and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading [Certificate of Live Birth] to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. [Presumed consent] They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor or to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.” [The UNITED STATES is a for-profit corporation.]
[PRESUMPTION]
In the 1950s, the Uniform Commercial Code was adopted in most of the States as a means of unifying the generally accepted procedures for handling the new legal system of dealing with commercial fictions as though they were real. Security instruments replaced substance as collateral for debts. Security instruments could be supported by presumptive adhesion contracts. Debt instruments with collateral and accommodating parties could be used instead of money. Money and the need for money was disappearing, and a uniform system of law had to be put in place to allow the courts to uphold the security instruments that depended on commercial fictions as a basis for compelling payment or performance. All this was accomplished by the mid-1960s.
The commercial code is merely a codification of accepted and required procedures which all people engaged in commercial activity must follow. The basic principles of commerce had been settled thousands of years ago, but were refined as commerce become more sophisticated over the years. In the 1900s, the age-old principles of commerce shifted from substance to form. Presumption became a major element of the law. Without giving a degree of force to legal presumption, the new direction in enforcing commercial claims could not be supported in Equity/Admiralty courts and had no chance in common law. If the claimants were required to produce their claims every time they tried to collect from the people, they would seldom be successful.
The principles articulated in the commercial code combine the methods of dealing with substantive commercial activity with presumptive commercial activity. These principles work as well for us as they do for the entrenched powers. The rules are neutral and respect neither side of a dispute, as they are ancient in origin.
The entrenched powers that engineered the scheme for the people to register their property and person with the United States and its instrumentalities gained control of the peoples’ property and right to property through registration and licensing. The United States became the trustee of the titles to everything. The definition of “property” is the interest one has in a thing. The thing is the principal. The property is the interest in the thing. Profits (interest) made from the property of another belong to the owner of the thing. The International Bankers made profits by pledging as surety the registered property of the people in commercial markets, but the profits do not belong to the Bankers. The profits belong to the owners of the thing. That is always the people. The corporation government shows only ownership of paper – titles to things. The substance cannot appear in the fiction. Sometimes the fiction is manufactured to appear as substance, but fiction can never become substance; it is an illusion. This is why the proper spelling of your name in upper and lower case is never used in court documents. The ALL CAPS spelling represents the legal fiction, which the government holds title to and jurisdiction over, as it is the creation of the government. The substance cannot appear in the fiction. What will happen when you appear and claim the name ascribed on the complaint? You and the fiction become one and the same; you have changed masks from a natural person to an artificial one.
The profits from all the registered property had to be put into trust for the benefit of the owners. If the profits were put into the general fund of the United States and not into separate trusts for the owners, the scheme would evidence fraud. The profits for each owner could not be co-mingled.
[CONSENT]
[The banksters cannot access our trust without our signatures as the beneficiaries, so they trick us into consenting by getting us to sign their documents.]
If the owner failed to use his available remedy (fictional credits held in a constructive trust account, fund, or financial ledger) to benefit from the profits, it would not be the fault of the government or their banking co-conspirators. If the owner failed to learn the law that would open the door to his remedy, it would not be the fault of the swindlers. The owner is responsible for learning the law so he understands that the profits from his property are available for him to discharge debts or charges brought against his legal fiction person by the United States or other commercial entities.
References
Fruit From a Poisonous Tree, Chapter Two, by Melvin Stamper, JD; Amazon
The Bankruptcy of 1933 by Judge Dale, retired
Congressional Record (June 1932)
Congressional Record (March 1933)
Congressional Record (March 1993)
Our Government is Just Another Corporation
Corporations Cannot be Sovereign Governments
Strategies for ‘denying consent’ can be found in the LAWFULLY YOURS guide – available as a free download.
AntiCorruption Society 
Pingback: Opting Out Of Your Legal STRAW MAN - Level9News
Pingback: “Kill anything that moves” | AntiCorruption Society
Reblogged this on Angel 4 Light.
Reblogged this on ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΑ ΝΕΑ ΤΩΡΑ • Greek News On Demand and commented:
As a result of the manipulated Bankruptcy of the United States in ’33 – exposed by Rep Lewis McFadden and others in the Congressional Record – that precipitated President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s confiscation of the people’s gold and implementation of The New Deal – the following change in the “Law of the Land” occurred.
I’ve seen the House quote, and believe the bragging involved, because (a) it’s the actual system, (b) House was a tool, and (c) the blackmail on WW meant banksters could afford frankness. Still I’d like to see digital scans, or an affidavit from a researcher who’s read originals. Otherwise the Internet just quotes itself. WW may have recorded the conversation as a quiet method of fighting, hoping a later generation would read it. Or it could be an echo chamber effect of the internet.
I suggest you contact attorney Melvin Stamper, author of the book Fruit From a Poisonous Tree for the information you seek. We quoted Stamper in this article, as we have stated.
However, if you want evidence that the banksters and their BAR have created a STRAWMAN type legal system, see: Proof that there is a STRAWMAN.
Since you have Melvin Stamper’s book, I suggest you post either (a) the footnote he supplies, or (b) omission thereof.
Since you quote House in public (if indirectly), not me, you should do any needful homework, not me. I’m sure Melvin Stamper would appreciate your correspondence more than mine, as you are far more knowledgeable.
I do not know if he pulled the quote from someplace online he simply “trusts,” and thus, patriot mythology lives another day. While I believe the passage, I do not consider “trust us” a fair way to win over those who question such matters, among them Devvy Kidd and Larry Becraft.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd274.htm
Devvy has issues with strawmen/corporate-USA. I do not. As I wrote, I know that it’s the actual system. Thanks for your tireless work in this area.
My issue is a self-referential circle of citations. I have seen the House quote in many places, but not a digital scan, paper copy, footnote, or citation of any kind beyond “private papers,” which is nebulous. If the papers are private (unpublished), a proper citation must state who actually claims to have read the original passage in them, and where to find this claim being made.
As I have so much documentation regarding the STRAWMAN, it is not an issue for me. One example is Proof of the STRAWMAN. I have tried several times to reach Melvin Stamper and have yet to succeed. I’d love to have him as a guest on my weekly RBN show In Defense of Humanity. My ‘take’ is that he has been threatened and is keeping a low profile.
Deevy Kidd is a well indoctrinated BAR attorney and I don’t know who Larry Beechcroft is. Deevy wails all of the time that the “Constitution” is being violated, yet she refuses to acknowledge the system that has replaced it.
Here is a excellent analysis of the BAR: The Legal Craft. While much supportive evidence is available regarding the STRAWMAN, BAR attorneys generally refuse to examine it, much like physicians won’t look closely at the vaccination scam and dentists won’t look closely at the fluoride scam. BAR attorneys, like Deevy, even refuse to comment on Senate Report 93-549. If they would read it and think about it, they would understand why the Executive branch of the US corporation violates the “Constitution” all of the time and has done so extensively since 1933.
Without the stealthy efforts of the bankster’s BAR, our courts would still recognize common law. As Stamper said in his book, the banksters needed contract law to be superior to all other law, so their financial scams could be enforced. Our signature is all they need. Full disclosure is not required in their legal system, as they have convinced judges to enforce a policy in their administrative courts: “ignorance of the law is no excuse”.
If you have not yet read LAWFULLY YOURS (available as a free download on our site), I recommended you do so.
By John Hamer
And what does the straw man want most of all from the Wizard of Oz? A brain. A ‘legal fiction’ PERSON does not have a brain because a ‘capitalised’ PERSON is not a living entity but all that the straw-man receives from the ‘great’ Oz is a certificate, a Birth Certificate perchance, as a newly ‘legalised’ entity – as indeed we are all regarded in the eyes of the State. He is so proud of his new ‘legal’ status, plus all the other legalisms he is graciously granted by Oz, that he lives up to his character as the brainless sack of straw, proudly clutching his Birth Certificate and defying all common sense. http://chrisspivey.org/john-hamers-the-wizard-of-oz/
Great contribution. Thanks
Hi. I’m General Maddox. Editor of http://www.realnewsaustralia.com
I’m a friend of Adam Crabb of the CrazzFiles.com site. I think you guys are doing a great job.
I have had a few people email me and I’ve seen people comment on Adam’s site, post Anita Whitney’s guest spot on his podcast, comment about Judge Dale being a hoax. This was quite concerning. Have you come across this? Surely you have. http://galacticconnection.com/judge-dale-is-a-hoax/#sthash.X5FOoOSL.SFuNmOOC.dpbs
I’d like your thoughts on this because you guys rely heavily on his work.
Again, I think you guys do great work and please don’t be angry. I just want to know the truth. My motto on my site is “Reading Between the Lies”.
After reading this anonymous posting by “snoop4truth” I am sort of surprised that you would even bother with it. It is clearly about unfounded accusations by an anonymous source claiming “forgery”. Doesn’t that ring a bell?
The notion that Rod Class is Judge Dale is preposterous to anyone who knows or who has ever listened to Rod Class.
Here is more validation of Judge Dale’s conclusions by John B. Nelson. John included many citations in his work, which Judge Dale did not. http://anticorruptionsociety.com/to-the-american-national-people/
Most people want Reader Digest style of material. They would find John Nelson’s work too difficult to comprehend and apply, which is why we didn’t feature it in LAWFULLY YOURS.
We include citations of many sources in LAWFULLY YOURS and throughout our web site.
The “snoop4truth” piece is a hitman attack by a BAR attorney. I even know who he is and where he practices law. When you read John Nelson’s work you will readily see that our monstrous injustice system was built brick by brick by stealth by the BAR. Judge Dale, Karen Hudes and Melvin Stamper all freely admit this fact. When you investigate who/what the BAR really is, you will understand their need to attack anyone who exposes them. See The Legal Craft.
As Ms Hudes said in an interview, it will be up to the people to reign in the BAR as they are making way too much money to reform themselves. They have replaced the Rule of Law with a deceptive system of corporate/banking rules that are then ruthlessly inflicted on an unsuspecting public. See The UCC and You
As we work to expose the BAR, I expect there will be many more hit pieces published on the internet. Currently BAR Judges are corrupt and above the law their brethren created. They will not be going quietly into the night.